Critical thinking in General
Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action. In its exemplary form, it is based on universal intellectual values that transcend subject matter divisions: clarity, accuracy, precision, consistency, relevance, sound evidence, good reasons, depth, breadth, and fairness.
It entails the examination of those structures or elements of thought implicit in all reasoning: purpose, problem, or question-at-issue; assumptions; concepts; empirical grounding; reasoning leading to conclusions; implications and consequences; objections from alternative viewpoints; and frame of reference. Critical thinking — in being responsive to variable subject matter, issues, and purposes — is incorporated in a family of interwoven modes of thinking, among them: scientific thinking, mathematical thinking, historical thinking, anthropological thinking, economic thinking, moral thinking, and philosophical thinking.
Critical thinking can be seen as having two components: 1) a set of information and belief generating and processing skills, and 2) the habit, based on intellectual commitment, of using those skills to guide behavior. It is thus to be contrasted with: 1) the mere acquisition and retention of information alone, because it involves a particular way in which information is sought and treated; 2) the mere possession of a set of skills, because it involves the continual use of them; and 3) the mere use of those skills ("as an exercise") without acceptance of their results.
Critical thinking varies according to the motivation underlying it. When grounded in selfish motives, it is often manifested in the skillful manipulation of ideas in service of one’’s own, or one's groups’’, vested interest. As such it is typically intellectually flawed, however pragmatically successful it might be. When grounded in fair mindedness and intellectual integrity, it is typically of a higher order intellectually, though subject to the charge of "idealism" by those habituated to its selfish use.
Critical thinking of any kind is never universal in any individual; everyone is subject to episodes of undisciplined or irrational thought. Its quality is therefore typically a matter of degree and dependent on , among other things, the quality and depth of experience in a given domain of thinking or with respect to a particular class of questions. No one is a critical thinker through-and-through, but only to such-and-such a degree, with such-and-such insights and blind spots, subject to such-and-such tendencies towards self-delusion. For this reason, the development of critical thinking skills and dispositions is a life-long endeavor.
It entails the examination of those structures or elements of thought implicit in all reasoning: purpose, problem, or question-at-issue; assumptions; concepts; empirical grounding; reasoning leading to conclusions; implications and consequences; objections from alternative viewpoints; and frame of reference. Critical thinking — in being responsive to variable subject matter, issues, and purposes — is incorporated in a family of interwoven modes of thinking, among them: scientific thinking, mathematical thinking, historical thinking, anthropological thinking, economic thinking, moral thinking, and philosophical thinking.
Critical thinking can be seen as having two components: 1) a set of information and belief generating and processing skills, and 2) the habit, based on intellectual commitment, of using those skills to guide behavior. It is thus to be contrasted with: 1) the mere acquisition and retention of information alone, because it involves a particular way in which information is sought and treated; 2) the mere possession of a set of skills, because it involves the continual use of them; and 3) the mere use of those skills ("as an exercise") without acceptance of their results.
Critical thinking varies according to the motivation underlying it. When grounded in selfish motives, it is often manifested in the skillful manipulation of ideas in service of one’’s own, or one's groups’’, vested interest. As such it is typically intellectually flawed, however pragmatically successful it might be. When grounded in fair mindedness and intellectual integrity, it is typically of a higher order intellectually, though subject to the charge of "idealism" by those habituated to its selfish use.
Critical thinking of any kind is never universal in any individual; everyone is subject to episodes of undisciplined or irrational thought. Its quality is therefore typically a matter of degree and dependent on , among other things, the quality and depth of experience in a given domain of thinking or with respect to a particular class of questions. No one is a critical thinker through-and-through, but only to such-and-such a degree, with such-and-such insights and blind spots, subject to such-and-such tendencies towards self-delusion. For this reason, the development of critical thinking skills and dispositions is a life-long endeavor.
Social Issues
Stomach Cancer
Why do we have to lose people to stomach cancer. I lost my father on June 13th of 2013. He was 53 when he died that’s too young to be worrying about those kinds of problems. He had everything right, a good family and caring friends. It hurts me that we have stomach cancer around.
Statistics show that there have been an average of only 27.7% of people that have actually survived 5 ears or more.
The other 83.3% have been known to have been deceased.
Some of the symptoms that have been recorded as:
It’s not right that we have to be in societies where we can’t live a normal life.
Some symptoms that have been ignored are recorded as:
Then you have the stubborn people that don’t want to be checked out because they want to be the manly men.
The way we lose people nowadays is not the way I thought this world was going to be. The solutions to the problems we have at hand is access to healthcare or medical aid, rehabilitation centers that accept to help for free.
Stomach Cancer
Why do we have to lose people to stomach cancer. I lost my father on June 13th of 2013. He was 53 when he died that’s too young to be worrying about those kinds of problems. He had everything right, a good family and caring friends. It hurts me that we have stomach cancer around.
Statistics show that there have been an average of only 27.7% of people that have actually survived 5 ears or more.
The other 83.3% have been known to have been deceased.
Some of the symptoms that have been recorded as:
- Alcohol use
- Cigarette smoking
- Diets high in foods that are preserved by drying, smoking, salting, or pickling
- Diet low in vegetables and fruits
- Exposure to chemicals used in rubber and lead manufacturing
- Family history of stomach cancer
It’s not right that we have to be in societies where we can’t live a normal life.
Some symptoms that have been ignored are recorded as:
- Bloating after meals
- Diarrhea or constipation
- Heartburn or indigestion
- Loss of appetite
- Nausea and vomiting
Then you have the stubborn people that don’t want to be checked out because they want to be the manly men.
The way we lose people nowadays is not the way I thought this world was going to be. The solutions to the problems we have at hand is access to healthcare or medical aid, rehabilitation centers that accept to help for free.